kuxiao17

responsibility. But the SAP and oracle differences in damages, so will the by the jury to decide. Oracle and SAP compensation requirement and billions of dollars have been proposed SAP lawyer only $40 million for compensation. Microsoft Office 2010 is so great.

November 4, 2007, according to foreign media reports, sources, Germany SAP company has agreed to pay $1.2 billion to oracle inscriptions, in exchange for a promise not to its software for SAP theft behavior and seek the punitive damages. Office 2010 is my favorite.

In addition, the lawsuit also because HP refused requests its new chief executive LiYiKe testified, and the subpoena to become more dramatic.

This several sources requirement not reveal their names because this case the judge requirements may not disclose this case both sides committed. Office 2007 can make life better and easier.

SAP has in this Pope lasted for three and a half years in the case, accept illegal ACTS admitted that its legal obligations and close the corresponding TomorrowNow subsidiary, the latter once the customer from oracle site illegally download millions of document. But the two companies still is after the compensation shall pay the amount of SAP, party differences do exist, and that is tens of millions of dollars other side is considered billions of dollars. This lawsuit from this week 2 begin.

Compensatory damages and the punitive damages, the former used to make up the difference is specific losses, the latter for the accused of wrongdoing make punishment. Office 2007 can make life better and easier.

Sources said SAP, oracle will need to get the agreement between the federal district court judge Felice • Hamilton (Hamilton) approved Phyllis take effect.

Law firm Dechert partner Scott Graham (Scott Graham) says, through a punitive damages and oracle, SAP can narrow agreement provides the evidence for the jury the range. Also, Microsoft Office is helpful.

he pointed out that, in this case, oracle may at the end of the requirements of this case attorney, SAP compensate for this case because the latter has agreed to responsibility. He said: "SAP may also